Cet article est publié en anglais. Une question à son sujet ? Écrivez-nous sur WhatsApp.
Renewal projects are an excellent opportunity for owners, a good one for developers — and for the municipalities too. As the field matured, parties emerged signing owners in potential buildings onto exclusivity (and even final!) agreements, to pass the projects on to developers. To protect owners — who don't necessarily hold the knowledge or experience — the Urban Renewal (Agreements for Organizing Transactions) Law was enacted in 2017. Here is everything you need to know about the non-shop before you sign.
What is a non-shop agreement?
An undertaking to refrain from negotiating, or contracting in any other agreement, about organizing the building's owners or advancing a renewal deal in any other way — except with the organizer's consent. The organizer wants to invest time and resources in finding a developer and assembling the required majority, and asks the owners to hold off for a limited period. But owners sometimes bind themselves in a one-sided undertaking that can stick them for a lingering period they'll struggle to exit. Before signing anything of the kind — consult a professional attorney who represents owners in urban renewal.
Before the first signature: the owners' gathering
Before any non-shop is signed, the organizer must convene the owners and explain. At the gathering the organizer presents: the agreement's essence and the law's main provisions; whether it acts for a developer; its fee (so far as known); any personal interest in the deal; whether an owner in the building acts on its behalf; and information about the Government Authority for Urban Renewal and the Commissioner for residents' complaints. The convening duty is met when: notice went out at least 7 days ahead; the notice was displayed prominently on or in the building; and at least 40% of the owners attended (public-housing apartments excluded from the count; in a 17+ apartment building, two gatherings summing to 40% suffice, with minimum first-gathering attendance).
What the written non-shop must contain
- The organizer's details;
- The signing date and the determining date;
- A clarification that the owners' compensation will be fixed in the renewal deal with the chosen developer — NOT in the non-shop;
- The organizer's undertakings: locating a developer capable of executing the renewal, and acting to sign the organizing agreement with the rest of the building's owners;
- An undertaking to act for the owners with loyalty and fairness.
The organizer must be a mensch: fairness and care duties
- Confidentiality: information received from an owner may not be disclosed or used without consent (statute and court orders aside).
- Fair play: acting for the owners loyally, fairly and in the accepted way — delivering every material piece of information about the deal.
- What am I signing?: before signature the organizer must explain the agreement's essence and its legal consequences, and hand the owners a copy together with the gathering's minutes.
How long does a non-shop live? Pinui-binui
The initial validity depends on reaching signing thresholds: 50%+ of owners in a building of up to 16 apartments; 40%+ or at least 8 owners (the higher) in a 17+ building; 35%+ in a 36+ building. If, within 18 months of the determining date, the organizer signed an organizing agreement with 67%+ of the owners — or its developer signed pinui-binui deals with the non-shop signatories — validity extends to 24 months. If within 24 months a demolish-and-rebuild plan filed by the organizer was received at a planning institution, validity runs to 4 years from the plan's receipt (only for plans enabling a permit) — and if the plan was deposited within those 4 years, to 5 years from receipt.
And in TAMA 38 (reinforcement)?
Initial validity: 6 months, extending to 12 on reaching the signing thresholds (50% in up-to-16 buildings; 40% or 8 owners in 17+). To 18 months where the organizer signed 80%+ of the owners, or its developer signed reinforcement deals with 33%+ of the non-shop signatories. And to 36 months where a permit application filed by the organizer was received at the local committee within 18 months.
Cogent — and only in the owners' favor
Any stipulation contrary to the law that doesn't favor an owner is VOID — for example, an exclusivity period longer than the statutory ones. And where up to 40% of the building is public housing, the validity thresholds are counted from the non-public apartments only.
How do you get free of an organizer?
- An organizing agreement that isn't in writing, or omits the signing/determining dates — is void.
- Missed milestones: where the organizer failed to advance the project per the statutory milestones, the residents' Commissioner may certify to the owners that the non-shop has lapsed.
- Beyond the statute: read the agreement for exit clauses — and better, negotiate an exit mechanism BEFORE signing (clear conditions letting owners cancel if targets are missed, plus an agreed dispute-resolution mechanism such as mediation).
- Mutual consent: sometimes the parties simply agree to cancel — present your reasons and negotiate.
- And where the organizer refuses — consult an attorney specializing in urban renewal on the options before you.
Why insist on the law's requirements even though the cancellation grounds are narrow? First — the law is the law. Second — exposure: in a refusing-resident proceeding, a sharp opponent will happily show the process wasn't run by the book. And an organizer or developer guards its reputation; the fairness and loyalty duties are the light it must act by.
A reasonable, fair non-shop serves both sides — when there's trust, loyalty and transparency. To do it right, appoint the owners' attorney at the start, before signing with anyone involved.
The above is initial information only and does not constitute legal advice or a substitute for it. Consult an attorney who practices in the field before taking any action.
Cette question se pose dans votre dossier ? Écrivez-nous : vous recevrez une réponse sur le fond, pas une brochure.
Informations générales, sans valeur de conseil juridique.